Paul Sizemore

Paul Sizemore  //  

Jun 27 / 11:55am

Making Ideas Happen by Scott Belsky

Making Ideas Happen

This is one of the best non-fiction books I’ve read, for me. It’s directed, the audience, is others like me – those dreamers out there. The people that have problems getting things excited because new ideas come so fast, they derail your energy.

One aspect that I’m big on is community, because I’ve not had that. So the concepts about community presented were particularly impacted me.  One of the most important figures cited was: an MIT Study stated employees with the most extensive social networks are 7% more productive, and those with the most cohesive face-to-face networks were 30% more productive.

   
Click here to download:
Making_Ideas_Happen_by_Scott_B.zip (117 KB)

The book also presents the idea that there are three types of creative people:

• The Doer: These people are obsessed with the logistics of execution and they immerse themselves in the next steps until they love it, or discount it.

• The Dreamer: These people have eternal creativity, and are eternally challenged by it. Dreamers are fun to be around, but might forget the details of the project.

• The Instrumentalist: these people can play the role of both the doer and the dreamer. They can bask in idea generation, distill the action steps, and then push the idea into action with tenacity. They also tend to conceive and execute on too many ideas, because they can. Their projects are seldom pushed to realization, because they move on to another one and never get buy in from the community.

An effective team needs both a Dreamer and a Doer. “Developing meaningful partnerships will make you more effective.”

Another key idea from the book, is seeing your ideas executed for the benefit of the good of the community. If you have an idea that will save people time or make their lives easier or better, and you don’t have the resources or discipline to execute the idea, then not sharing that idea, so others might execute it can be seen as an integrity violation (if you value the greater good). By not sharing the idea, you are denying people access to it, and not seeking the betterment of the idea.

Ideas are quickly realized, and die quickly, unless they are kept at the top of the mind by something external – like community involvement. The book also presents the idea that you, as the ideator, have a responsibility to inform and engage those people who can play a crucial role in executing your ideas. If no one understands what you are doing, what you need to succeed or the value of your idea, then you will fail to execute the idea. If your community isn’t interested in your idea, you will fail.

Many of the concepts in this book have been presented in other books, blogs and even conversations I've had with other creatives. This book presents it the best, and it's high on my recomended non-fiction book list.

Filed under  //  Book Report   Management   Product Management  

Comments (0)

Jun 4 / 6:44am

A visit to 'WorkShop: the creative work place'

In an effort to find creative workspace for the remote creative knowledge worker in Louisville, KY, I stopped by to see Stephanie Ringer at the WorkShop on 1205 East Washington Street, Louisville, KY. In addition to being near Blind Pig, the space is full of creativity and energy. 

It's the best local space I've seen for ideation and product development. It's full of painted white boards, markers, flip charts, post its, index cards, tape - everything you need for creative business play. 

The only thing that I think it's missing is an arsenal of nerf guns. 

 

             

Filed under  //  Louisville   Management   Product Management  

Comments (0)

Nov 14 / 6:35am

The Zen Approach to Project Management by George Pitagorsky

A few years ago I had the fortune to see George Pitagorsky speak at Kindred Project Management Day, and his message resonated with me. I was working for a start-up at the time, and there was continual chaos. Fires were standard, and projects could turn faster than a F1 in Monaco. 

I've read his book several times, and recently reread it, so I wanted to share a few key points from the book. I strongly urge you to get your hands on a copy, and read it, though. It's a great book, and in this day of iterative projects, you need an appreciation like this. 

Stakeholders want certainty; projects are uncertain. As project managers we communicate to stakeholders with hard figures: budgets, timelines and specific deliverables. We also deal with extreme ambiguity: resource performance, executive confidence and team buy-in. As professional project managers, we balance the paradox and dichotomy. 

The project is a complex system, and some have an illusion of control. The project manager is a manager, not a project controller. Only hard, quantitative aspects can be controlled. The project is more like a heard of cattle running rather than a single horse. To manage well means to be nonlinear; doing the right things at the right time to keep all the cattle headed in the right direction. You have different tools and techniques.

Through mindfulness we can affectively plan for a realistic and positive outcome. 

Either/or thinking needs to be replaced with a continuum. Life is not black and white, and projects aren't either. Ultimately the success of a project is the result of 'gut feelings' on decisions. Many project managers really disagree with this statement because they are project managers because of the false sense of project control. 

Accepting Uncertainty:  "We jump into the icy cold water ready to enjoy the shock and cleansing it will bring"

That's one of my favorite quotes from the book, and it's part of the reason I now jump in the Ohio River every February in support of Louisville's Special Olympics. When I jump it reminds me that at any point in my life I could be up to my neck in problems, and I'll simply find a way out. The cleansing part of the quote really isn't applicable to the Ohio River. 

       
Click here to download:
The_Zen_Approach_to_Project_Ma.zip (617 KB)

Filed under  //  Book Report   Management  

Comments (0)

Nov 7 / 8:46pm

3 Responses to Professional Conflict

Over the twenty years of my professional and adult life, I've had a lot of conflicts (as we all have). Don't misunderstand me on this one, I'm not contrary, or conflicting. I'm very agreeable, and only remain steadfast on what I truly believe in. 

That said, my conflicts have varied between professional to down right nasty. All of them, however, can be characterized into three main categories, as far as responses to me bringing up the conflict. 

People have: Broke off communication, they have lashed out at me, and they have gave in. 

Breaking Off
A friend of mine once lead his negotiating team out of the meeting room, and broke off all communication with the other side. That was their calculated response to the conflict. It was a bargaining tactic.  Ending the dialog forces the fall back plans. This tactic is effective when the other party doesn't really want to 'Plan B' or doesn't even have a 'Plan B.' My friend was fully prepared to take the alternative to an amicable solution, the other team wasn't. 

Lashing Out
The tantrum in the board room often extends beyond interests, and looks to be punitive over conflict in an attempt to resolve feelings of inequality or lack of fairness. Lashing out can be effective when there isn't a strong fallback or walkaway alternative. It's very effective as a negotiation tactic if the other party tends to give in. Often a contest of wills become a contest of egos. To combat Lashing Out, be sure your fallback plan is communicated, and they understand that you are ready to take it. 

Giving In
This is an effective tactic for 'picking their battles' or if the negotiation is going to drain too many resources. If they don't have the resources to come to the negotiations prepared to persuade, then their best option might be to give in. 

All of these are responses to conflict, and as a negotiator it's important to go beyond those responses and find the proposals that will create win-win solutions. 

Remember, listening is the cheapest concession you can make in a negotiation, and it might give you just what you are looking for, a way to create a win-win situation. 
Filed under  //  Management  

Comments (0)

Oct 26 / 3:39pm

The Ego is in the Idea

This is an expansion of slide four and five, rather than a written recap of the embedded slide show.

Ideas are a dime-a-dozen, at least to the ideators. Once you get it, get connecting cultural events & artifacts in order to solve problems in a creative way, ideas will come everywhere. Everywhere you are, and everywhere there's culture. They'll keep coming non-stop 'till the break of dawn.

Everyone has cultural artifacts that resonate with them, and they hold on to those in their mind. They look for ways to remember them, and put them to use (usually in conversation). "Remember when Michael Jackson's hair caught on fire!" "Yeah, it went up like a tree. Remember when we burned that dried Christmas tree. That was great."

In this age, the vast majority of our cultural artifacts are shared with at least thousands of people. Ideas are connections of these cultural artifacts in a creative context to solve an idea. So, the only differences in the ideator is the remembrance of the cultural artifacts, her ability to pull those artifacts and the creativity to put them together.

So, the idea spark is the ideators response to constrains in her cultural environment. To assume ownership of the entire idea, when it is only a response, is in service to the ego. If the ego is in the idea, then it's a disservice to the entire innovation process, and the product isn't going to reach the potential it would if the idea was vetted in a community ideation process. 

The Stairway to Innovation

</object>

Filed under  //  Management  

Comments (0)